can-digital-history-be-rewritten Digital Archaeology

Digital Archaeology

Can Digital History Be Rewritten?

This question reexamines the possibility of constructing and altering history in the digital age. Web archives and digital records can greatly change the interpretation of history depending on who saves what and how it is presented. Deleted data, edited logs, biased archives — is digital history more rewritable than physical history, or is it protected by technological and structural constraints? It explores the essence of digital memory wavering between the 'truthfulness' and 'plasticity' of history.

01 Plasticity Theory

The view that digital data is inherently editable, deletable, and reconfigurable, and that history is always rewritten from the current perspective. The evolution of preservation technology enables diverse interpretations of history.

02 Immutability Theory

The view that due to technologies such as distributed archives and blockchain, tampering with digital history is extremely difficult, and 'truth' is preserved more than in physical history.

03 Power Structure Theory

The view that the possibility of rewriting history is not a matter of technology, but a matter of power: who manages the archive and controls access. Emphasizes the politics of preservation.

  1. When looking back at your past SNS posts or blog, have you ever felt 'I didn't want to write it that way at that time'?

  2. If all past web pages could be deleted, which pages would you want to delete? Why?

  3. Which do you think is closer to 'real history': history textbooks or web archives?

  4. If someone tried to edit or delete your past digital records, what emotions would arise?

  5. Is digital history easier or harder to rewrite compared to physical history (paper documents or ruins)?

  6. How do you think people in the future will interpret the digital history of our era? Do you think you can control that interpretation?

Truth vsInterpretation
Do digital records leave objective truth, or do they expand the room for interpretation? Does the ease of rewriting damage truthfulness?
Individual vsCollective
The tension between the right to protect individual digital history and the obligation to maintain collective historical records. Does rewriting protect individual privacy or damage collective memory?
Technology vsPower
Does technological evolution make rewriting history easier, or do those in power control technology to control rewriting?
Talk note

This theme is a space to consider through each other's experiences how history is made, told, and sometimes rewritten in the digital age. It is a dialogue that respects the possibility of various interpretations rather than denying someone's past.

Digital History
Historical records and their interpretations formed through the internet and digital media. Includes web pages, SNS logs, databases, etc.
Rewriting History
Changing, selecting, or emphasizing records or interpretations of past events to fit current purposes or values. In the digital age, there are aspects that have become technically easier.
Archive Bias
The phenomenon where preserved data is biased by the preserver's intentions, technical constraints, or power structures. Determines whose voice remains and whose disappears.
Ice breaker

Is there anything in your past digital records (SNS, blog, email, etc.) that you thought 'I don't want to keep this'? Why did you think so?

Deep dive

If you could time travel and meet your past self, which era's digital records would you like to look back on together? And how would you interpret those records?

Bridge

When the other person talks about their digital history, gently ask 'which records is that interpretation based on?' Let's discover together that there are multiple perspectives.

  • Who should be the administrator of digital archives?
  • Does deleted data disappear from history?
  • Risks of AI-generated automatic history and rewriting
  • Differences between open-source archives and commercial archives