Knowledge Gap Hypothesis
Is There Something Lost by Becoming More Knowledgeable?
Is there something lost by becoming more knowledgeable? asks whether, in the process of deepening and specializing knowledge, one loses the 'fresh wonder,' 'perspective that sees the whole,' and 'naive questions' one had as a novice. In the context of the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis, as one becomes an expert, the distance from novices widens, and forgetting the novice-era sensibility further expands the gap as one aspect of the 'curse of knowledge.' This question doubts the premise that knowledge acquisition is always a 'gain' and reconsiders the value of what is lost.
The 'novice perspective' and 'fresh wonder' lost in the process of becoming more knowledgeable are irreversible losses that can never be regained. Experts live forever carrying 'what was lost.'
What is lost is not a 'cost' but an 'exchange'; in place of the shallow novice perspective, deeper insight and sense of responsibility are gained. Losing is part of evolution.
After becoming knowledgeable, through training and experiences to return to the 'novice perspective' again, what was lost can be partially recovered. Metacognition and dialogue with others are key.
The value of 'what is lost' depends on context. In some situations loss is damage, but in others that loss generates new discoveries or creations. The meaning of loss is not uniform.
-
When you felt you had 'become more knowledgeable,' was there something you simultaneously felt you had lost? What was it?
-
Are there situations where you can still feel the 'fresh wonder' or 'naive questions' you had in your novice days?
-
What things have become 'harder to see' or 'harder to feel' because you became more knowledgeable?
-
When experts or teachers speak nostalgically about 'when I was a novice,' what do you think they feel they have lost?
-
Can you positively frame 'losing' something as knowledge increases, rather than negatively?
-
If you could return to 'yourself before becoming more knowledgeable,' what would you most want to regain?
This topic does not deny increasing knowledge. It is a dialogue to honestly acknowledge what is lost by becoming more knowledgeable, and by talking about each other's 'what was lost' and 'what remains,' to gently bridge knowledge gaps.
- Curse of Expertise
- The cognitive bias where, as one becomes an expert, one loses the novice perspective and fresh sensibility of novice days, overestimating others' understanding. A contributing factor to gap widening.
- Naive Questions
- Fundamental questions that arise in the shallow knowledge stage, doubting common sense and premises. They tend to be lost as one becomes more knowledgeable, yet are also a source of creativity.
- Holistic View
- The perspective that surveys the connections and context of the whole rather than details. As specialization advances, one tends to fall into local optimization and lose the holistic view.
- Fresh Wonder
- The emotional reaction of 'Amazing!' or 'Why?' when first learning something. As knowledge increases, wonder fades and things become taken for granted.
- Cost of Knowledge
- A general term for what is lost accompanying knowledge acquisition (perspective, emotion, relationship, etc.). Knowledge gaps appear as differences not only in 'what was gained' but also in 'what was lost.'
If there is something you might have lost by becoming more knowledgeable, what do you think it is? Please tell me within a range that doesn't embarrass you.
If you could return to 'yourself before becoming more knowledgeable' and relearn the same field from scratch, what would you most want to learn first, and with what feelings?
While listening to the other, imagine 'At what depth of knowledge is this person now, and what might they have lost?' How to handle that lost thing in dialogue.
- When AI becomes 'more knowledgeable' than humans, what do humans lose?
- Is training to intentionally regain the 'novice perspective' possible?
- Can what was lost by becoming more knowledgeable be regained through art or play?
- Can loss of knowledge become a 'source of creativity'?
- Why do conversations between experts sound like a 'lost world' to novices?
- Is there a way to become more knowledgeable without fearing loss?